| The legitimacy of the use of force by the police and the military often generates significant debate. In recent years there has been a re-emerging interest in so-called ‘non-lethal’ or ‘less-lethal’ weapons: equipment supposed to minimize or at least reduce the severity of injury in comparison to other options. While items such as plastic bullets, chemical irritant sprays, and electroshock equipment still dominate available non-lethal options, the future is supposed to bring a diverse array of acoustic, electromagnetic, biological, and chemical devices. | ||
|
|
My research has often suggested the need for skepticism regarding the
purported benefits of this class of weaponry. While not wishing to completely
dismiss the potential of alternative force options to help realize more
preferable outcomes, the deployment of non-lethal weapons raises various
grounds for concern. |
|
On-line Publications
(For a complete listing of my publications click here) Rappert, B. 2003. Non-Lethal Weapons as Legitimizing
Forces?: Technology, Politics and the Management of Conflict London:
Frank Cass, pp. 1-286. Introduction
Rappert, B. 2003. Submission to the Northern Ireland Office and Home Office December 2002 Patten Recommendations 69 and 70 Relating to Public Order Equipment Report. pp. 1-5. (See UK Review of Public Order Equipment) Rappert, B. 2002. ‘The Future of Force’ Science and Public Affairs October 6-7. Rappert, B. 2002. Submission to the Northern Ireland Office and Home Office December 2001 Patten Recommendations 69 and 70 Relating to Public Order Equipment Report. pp. 1-55. (See UK Review of Public Order Equipment) |
||
Back to Brian Rappert's Home Page