The ethology and sociobiology of animal communication
Sign stimuli and releasers
-
Comparative ethologists Heinroth, Huxley, Lorenz, Tinbergen:
identified simple Fixed Action Patterns triggered off by Sign
Stimuli
-
In some (but not all) cases, the sign stimuli are features
of another animal (usually a conspecific) that seems to have no other function,
and therefore can be assumed to have evolved to act as a trigger; such
stimuli are called Releasers
-
Often there are also characteristic FAPs that make the releasing
stimulus more visible or effective
-
The comparative ethologists conceived of such releaser/fixed
action patterns as a system of (partly instinctive) communication
between the two animals (the sender and the receiver)
Communication or exploitation?
-
Sociobiologists e.g. Krebs & Dawkins questioned the co-operative
implications of terms like communication
-
They stressed instead that if the releaser is to evolve,
showing it must confer some advantage on the sender. So instead of
communication we might talk about advertisement or manipulation
-
If the receiver's response is to evolve, it should also confer
advantage on the receiver. But there might be an advantage to responding
to other stimuli like the signal in question, and the sender mimics
such stimuli
-
The evolution of such exploitative signals depends on receiver
psychology - the set of stimuli the receiver will respond to
-
Some signals clearly benefit both sender and receiver (but
not necessarily equally)
-
Signals that benefit the receiver but not the sender would
be examples of altruistic behaviour so would require special conditions
(kin selection, reciprocation) if they are to evolve
Communication and intention
-
Some people argue that if we want to use the word "communication",
the sender must intend to send a particular message to the receiver
-
Neither ethology nor sociobiology requires this. It
is enough that the message produces a reliable effect on the receiver's
behaviour
-
The receiver need not be of the same species as the sender
- e.g. in communication between predators and prey, or between different
species attacked by the same predators
-
Dawkins refers to the Extended phenotype: communication
allows an animal's genotype to modify the bodies of other animals, not
just its own