ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG15 (Posix) Meeting, Heidelberg, Germany May 1993 Meeting Report 0. Introduction: Twenty-three delegates from Germany, the Netherlands, the US, the UK, Canada, France, Japan, Germany and the Netherlands attended the WG15 meeting. The agenda included eighty-seven action items and some fifty papers for consideration. The Plenary ran from the 12th to the 14th of May, preceded on the 10th and 11th by meetings of the Rapporteur Groups on Internationalisation, Conformance Testing, Security and also on Coordination of Profile Activities. 1. Plenary: Following the concern raised by France at the previous WG15 meeting of the overlap, and therefore potential for conflict, between the Ada Real-Time work in WG9 and the Ada binding to 9945-1:1990 there was a discussion of the French comments on the Ada and 'c' work. The US is not happy with the present deadlock and reserved the right to introduce the Ada document on a fasttrack program. France wants closer alignment of the Ada and 'c' drafts to eliminate as far as possible semantic differences before their publication; the French position is that a thick Ada binding is acceptable as a DIS, but must be transformed to a thin binding to an LIS-based standard before it becomes an IS. The other main discussion revolved around the continuing commitment of the US's IEEE PASC development body to producing LIS-based standards. The essence of the problem, as presented to WG15 by the US delegation and described in two WG15 papers, is one of diminishing resources - less manpower and less money to fund attendees at the IEEE Posix meetings - and of increasing demand on the resources that remain - more work in terms of drafts to be produced together with higher fees to fund the standards- making activity. The IEEE PASC proposal is, briefly: . Language Independent Specifications (LIS) to be suspended, with a proposition to WG15 that when WG11 completes its work, IEEE Posix will consider drafting its work in WG11 terms. Meanwhile drafts will be submitted to ISO WG15 in 'c', Ada, Fortran or Modula-2 form, as appropriate. WG15 spent some time on the ensuing debate, noting that the IEEE PASC Posix groups had not yet committed to this course of action and that the US TAG was investigating other potential sources of Posix LIS work, should IEEE PASC so commit. It was understood that WG15's scope required it to produce LIS-based standards. WG15 resolved: . To investigate the most appropriate means of satisfying the requirement to provide coordination and consistency between multiple language bindings to the same services - for which the current LIS methods were originally formulated - taking account of the work of other groups, such as WG11. . That it will accept Language Dependent Specification (LDS) documents for progression to DIS, without an accompanying LIS, on an individual basis where Member Bodies support the action, until such time as it determines the precise form in which the requirements and objectives, for which LIS was originally formulated, are to be met. . To request the US to preserve and progress in a timely manner the LIS work that is currently underway, taking fully into account the requirements and objectives indicated, and to ensure that US standards developed for progression within SC22/WG15 satisfy those requirements and objectives. Of the current pieces of Posix standardisation work in progress, 9945-2, the 'Shell and Utilities' standard, closes its DIS ballot on 6-June. Assuming the SC22 secretariat requests WG15 to do so, a Disposition of Comments meeting was tentatively scheduled for July, in conjunction with the IEEE PASC Posix meeting. The Disposition of Comments meeting on the 'Real-Time' amendment to 9945-1, held in January, reached a satisfactory conclusion on all the comments and WG15 anticipates that the SC22 secretariat will pass the resulting document for DIS circulation. WG15 Plenary produced sixty-five action items, (nine of which will require the attention of IST/5/-/15), plus eighteen resolutions. 2. UK Delegation: The UK delegation consisted of: David Cannon UK BSI IST/5/-/15 Convenor, PUKE (University of Exeter) Martin Kirk (X/Open Company Ltd) Two UK experts attended the RGCT meeting and part of the Plenary: Colin O'Driscoll RGCT Rapporteur (NCC) Dan Chacon (BSI QA) One UK expert attended the RGCPA meeting on the 10th and 11th: Don Folland RGCPA Rapporteur (CCTA) David Cannon 17-May-1993