ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG15 (Posix) Meeting, Reading, United Kingdom October 1992 Meeting Report 0. Introduction: The Plenary ran from the 27th to the 30th of October, preceded by meetings of the Rapporteur Groups on Conformance Testing, Security, Internationalisation and also on Coordination of Profile Activities. Thirty-one delegates from the US, the UK, Canada, France, Japan, Germany, Denmark and New Zealand attended the Plenary. The agenda included sixty action items and some seventy-five papers for consideration; the Plenary scheduled three sub-groups for one half-day in order to best manage the work-load. 1. Plenary: One area of concern, raised by France, is the apparent overlap, and therefore potential for conflict, between the Ada Real-Time work in WG9 and the Ada binding to the Posix Real-Time Amendment to 9945-1:1990. WG15 recognised that these need to be addressed and felt the problem was best registered on the WG15 Issues List at present, to ensure that it remained visible. Various concerns raised by the UK referencing Conformance issues were discussed by WG15: the points first raised as comments on the Posix Test Methods NP, and subsequently raised at the SC22 Plenary, Tampere, will be addressed by the development of an NP for Test Methods to be drafted by the UK Member Body. The UK has also been discussing the concept of a new class of conformance, referred to as "Rigorously Conforming": The Posix draft standards currently state that even "strictly conforming" POSIX applications do not require conformance to the Language standard; e.g. a "strictly conforming" application only needs to satisfy the requirements of the binding. "Rigorously Conforming" would combine strictly conforming to the POSIX standard plus strictly conforming to the language standard. (The objective of the higher level class of conformance is to further increase the level of portability of an application). The outcome of the discussion was that the UK prepare an expert contribution describing the proposed new class of conformance and submit it to the development body for consideration. A number of minor problems have arisen over recent months with ballots and/or comments being lost in transmission through the SC22 secretariat. The latest is that the Posix Test Methods NP (P1003.3) has been mis-registered as a Type 3 Technical Report rather than as a new standard. WG15 resolved to notify the SC22 secretariat and request this to be corrected ASAP. WG15 Plenary produced seventy-six action items, (seventeen of which will require the attention of IST/5/-/15), plus twenty- five resolutions. 2. UK Delegation: The UK was well represented at Reading, this being 'home ground', the delegation consisting of: David Cannon UK BSI IST/5/-/15 Convenor, PUKE (University of Exeter) Don Folland Meeting Chair (CCTA) Derek Jones UK BSI IST/5/-/14 Convenor (Knowledge Software) Martin Kirk Meeting Secretary (X/Open Company Ltd) Greger Leijonhufvud RIN Rapporteur (SCO) Two UK experts attended the RGCT meeting at the beginning of the week on behalf of IST/5/-/15: Colin O'Driscoll RGCT Rapporteur (NCC) Dan Chacon (BSI QA) Dave Cannon 9-November-1992