Date: Tue, 4 Oct 1994 14:58:30 -0400
From: isaak@csac.ljo.dec.com (Jim Isaak- isaak@csac.enet.dec.com)
To: sc22wg15@dkuug.dk
Subject: oh yes, DIS 13210 comments
Cc: 3lgj@rsvl.unisys.com, rjmartin@nist.gov

We had comments on DIS 13210, which we should
prepare a disposition of comments for...

Also, I would ask that national bodies attending
that had comments come prepared to help with this
effort.

Comments:

France: Draft is obsolete (IEEE Std 1003.3:1991)
	Relevant draft is 2003/Draft 3.0 March 94,
	France's comments stated at CD stage are taken into
	account in this draft.	AFNOR will reconsider its
	disapproval vote when P 2003/D3.0 is submitted to vote.

Japan:
	7 Editorial comments
	[change IEEE to ISO stds, remove "revisions & supplements"
	from Intro, Change Title (remove "IEEE"), add to normative
	references "9945-2:1993", change descriptions of POSIX.x
	to appropriate ISO 9945-x references, add C standard in Annex A,
	change reference to IEEE 729 to appropirate ISO std on pg. 2]

	1 Technical comment:
	"In Section 4: Testing levels and complexity levels,
	there are only definitions of the levels.  Therefore, it is more
	appropriate to move these definitions to the Definitions
	subsection 2.2. It is also suggested that the normative
	rules should clearly use the "shall" verb.

3) A concern was raised by Ukraine about not having received
	this ballot, among others (ITTF issue, not WG15 level)

Thats it,

Thanks, jim