From erik@sran8.sra.co.jp Mon Apr 22 02:16:41 1991 Received: from mcsun.EU.net by dkuug.dk via EUnet with SMTP (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8) id AA10348; Mon, 22 Apr 91 02:16:41 +0200 Received: from srawgw.sra.co.jp by mcsun.EU.net with SMTP; id AA09594 (5.65a/CWI-2.83); Mon, 22 Apr 91 02:16:32 +0200 Received: from srava.sra.co.jp by srawgw.sra.co.jp (5.64WH/1.4) id AA03984; Mon, 22 Apr 91 09:16:51 +0900 Received: from sran8.sra.co.jp by srava.sra.co.jp (5.64b/6.4J.6-BJW) id AA16050; Mon, 22 Apr 91 09:15:49 +0900 Received: from localhost by sran8.sra.co.jp (4.0/6.4J.6-SJ) id AA08402; Mon, 22 Apr 91 09:12:26 JST Return-Path: Message-Id: <9104220012.AA08402@sran8.sra.co.jp> Reply-To: erik@sra.co.jp From: Erik M. van der Poel To: wg15rin@dkuug.dk Subject: symbolic names in localedef Date: Mon, 22 Apr 91 09:12:25 +0900 Sender: erik@sran8.sra.co.jp X-Charset: ASCII X-Char-Esc: 29 Dear wg15rinners: Some of the localedefs that I have seen use instead of %. One might think that the portable characters don't need to be surrounded by <>. Is there a reason for using the symbolic names for absolutely everything? Erik