From pfm@hpfclj.fc.hp.com Thu Dec 6 20:17:22 1990 Received: from hpseso.sde.hp.com by dkuug.dk via EUnet with SMTP (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8) id AA12933; Thu, 6 Dec 90 20:17:22 +0100 Received: from hpfclj.fc.hp.com by hpseso.sde.hp.com with SMTP (15.11/SES42.42) id AA24271; Thu, 6 Dec 90 11:20:41 pst Received: from hpfcpfm.fc.hp.com by hpfclj.fc.hp.com with SMTP (15.11/15.6) id AA15214; Thu, 6 Dec 90 12:20:50 mst To: erik%sra.co.jp@hplb.hpl.hp.com Cc: seki@sysrap.cs.fujitsu.co.jp, wg15rin@dkuug.dk, XoTGinter%xopen@uiunix.UUCP, erik@sra.co.jp Subject: Re: (seq 1416) Re: Japanese Profile In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Nov 90 16:51:52 MST." <9011280752.AA02415@sran8.sra.co.jp> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 90 12:20:47 MST Message-Id: <15755.660511247@hpfclj> From: Pam Miller X-Charset: ASCII X-Char-Esc: 29 Erik, > Perhaps it would be better to take "era" out of the general LC_COLLATE > rules, and add a hook to the rules for defining locale-specific rules. > I can hear all of you saying "But how can you internationalize > programs then?" Well, I think that it is likely that only Japanese > programs will use %E and %o (for the era year), so in some sense, > these programs would be localized rather than internationalized. There are other locale's that use "era". I believe both Korea and Taiwan have the concept of era's. If the proposal is not adequate to address the era requirements, then I believe we should extend it, not remove it. Pam Miller Hewlett Packard pfm@hpfclj.hp.com