From dominic@british-national-corpus.oxford.ac.uk Thu Oct  3 14:44:14 1991
Received: from eros.uknet.ac.uk by dkuug.dk via EUnet with SMTP (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8)
	id AA26956; Thu, 3 Oct 91 14:44:14 +0100
Received: from convex.oxford.ac.uk by eros.uknet.ac.uk via JANET 
          with NIFTP (PP) id <9874-0@eros.uknet.ac.uk>;
          Thu, 3 Oct 1991 12:48:48 +0100
Received: from onions.natcorp by convex.oxford.ac.uk;
          Thu, 3 Oct 91 12:28:00 +0100
Received: by onions.natcorp.ox.ac.uk (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA11046;
          Thu, 3 Oct 91 12:26:20 BST
Message-Id: <9110031126.AA11046@onions.natcorp.ox.ac.uk>
From: dominic@british-national-corpus.oxford.ac.uk
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1991 12:26:20 +0100
In-Reply-To: erik@sra.co.jp (Erik M. van der Poel) "(SC22WG15RIN.162) Re: WG15RIN May minutes" (Oct 2, 19:57)
X-Fax: +44 865 273275
X-Phone: +44 865 273280
X-Project: British National Corpus
X-Organization: Oxford University Computing Service
X-Address: 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN, U.K.
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.2 4/12/91)
To: wg15rin@dkuug.dk
Subject: Re: (SC22WG15RIN.162) Re: WG15RIN May minutes
Cc: erik@sra.co.jp
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29

Esteemed list readers,

> Um, that's not what I said...

Thanks to Erik for his correction.  Does anybody have more?  I propose
that, unless I got whole chunks of the minutes radically wrong, we
handle this and further corrections as notes under the ``Review of
minutes of last meeting'' agenda item in Stockholm, so avoiding the need
to revise and recirculate to whole of the May minutes.

-- 
Dominic Dunlop