From domo@tsa.co.uk Mon May 6 19:52:47 1991 Received: from kestrel.ukc.ac.uk by dkuug.dk via EUnet with SMTP (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8) id AA20703; Mon, 6 May 91 19:52:47 +0200 Received: from bugs.specialix.co.uk by kestrel.Ukc.AC.UK with SMTP id ab28921; 6 May 91 17:06 BST Received: from tsa.co.uk by specialix.co.uk id aa11475; Mon, 6 May 91 15:57:45 GMT From: Dominic Dunlop Date: Mon, 6 May 91 14:26:12 BST Message-Id: <26738.9105061326@tsa.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Keld J|rn Simonsen "(wg15rin 107) new POSIX byte definition" (Apr 28, 10:51) X-Fax: +44 491 651751 X-Phone: +44 491 652590 X-Address: 9 The Forty, Cholsey, OXON OX10 9LH, U.K. X-Organization: The Standard Answer Ltd. X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.1.2 7/11/90) To: keld@dkuug.dk, wg15rin@dkuug.dk Subject: Re: (wg15rin 107) new POSIX byte definition X-Charset: ASCII X-Char-Esc: 29 Hal's proposal looks fine to me. However, given the ensuing discussion in this group, it appears that it would be helpful formally to discuss this issue in Rotterdam. May I propose that it appears as item 4.7 on our agenda? While diddling with the agenda, may I also propose that item 4.5, Revised Questionnaire, is moved above 4.3, ISO 10646 and 4.4, Invariant ISO 646 support? We have failed to spend significant time on the questionnaire for during our last two meetings: let's put it in a position where it is less likely to be squeezed out by the pressure of time. -- Dominic Dunlop