From roger.martin@sun.com Wed Mar 22 21:29:36 2000 Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id VAA87001 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 21:29:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from roger.martin@sun.com) Received: from sunmail1.Sun.COM ([129.145.1.2]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA18786; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:29:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from jurassic.eng.sun.com (jurassic.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.81.144]) by sunmail1.Sun.COM (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1/ENSMAIL,v1.6.1-sunmail1) with ESMTP id MAA18498; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:29:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from rjmartin.sun.com (martin-home.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.88.189]) by jurassic.eng.sun.com (8.10.1.Beta0+Sun/8.10.1.Beta0) with ESMTP id e2MKTRb202137; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:29:27 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.20000322122553.00ac1cf0@jurassic.eng.sun.com> X-Sender: rjmartin@jurassic.eng.sun.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:28:55 -0800 To: Oblinger Jim T NPRI , "WG15 \(E-mail\)" From: Roger Martin Subject: Re: (wg15tag 2415) (SC22WG15.1479) Electronic Ballot - Resolutions from July 1999 Meeting In-Reply-To: <200003201710.SAA76153@dkuug.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed TO: WG15 Convener FROM: Roger Martin, HoD U.S. Subj: Electronic Ballot - Resolutions from July 1999 Meeting The U.S. reaffirms the positive (Approve) vote it cast for each of the ten draft resolutions at the July 1999 WG15 meeting. ----------------------------------------------------- At 12:01 PM 3/20/00 -0500, Oblinger Jim T NPRI wrote: >20 March 2000 > >To: WG15 > >From: Jim Oblinger - WG15 Convener > >Subj: Electronic Ballot - Resolutions from July 1999 Meeting > >During the July 1999 WG15 meeting in Montreal there was a discussion >concerning whether votes taken during the meeting could be binding since >there were only three member bodies represented. At the meeting I decided, >as the Convener, that we would hold a 45-day electronic ballot to approve >the resolutions. A vote was taken at the time on whether to include each >resolution in the minutes, but the electronic vote was to be the official >vote. > >After the WG15 meeting was held, I had conversations with several SC22 >officials concerning quorum requirements and official rules covering this >issue. Their decision finally was that the procedures under which WG15 >operates offers no guidance on this questions and that it was up to the >Convener's descretion. It was my intent at that point to declair the vote >taken at the meeting to be the official vote. That I have not done so in a >timely fashion makes it unfair to do so now. > >Per the WG15 meeting minutes I am submitting to the WG15, an electronic >ballot on each of the resolutions developed during the July 1999 WG15 >Meeting. There are ten resolutions numbered 99-415 to 99-424. The voting >is on each resolution separately. > > > BALLOT > >Please vote to approve (Yes vote), disapprove (No vote) or abstain >(Abstention vote)on the ten resolutions included in the July 1999 WG15 >Meeting minutes. These ten resolutions are included below. > >I have provided a ballot form for this vote. You may use this or simply >indicate, in your email vote, the resolution number and submitted vote. >Please respond to the WG15 Convener at: > > < j.oblinger@ieee.org > NO LATER than 4 May 2000. > >PLEASE RESPOND DIRECTLY TO THE WG15 CONVENER - >NOT TO THE REFLECTOR > > Thank you for your cooperation. > >*********************************************************** > >Resolution Vote (Yes/No/Abstain) > >99-415 >99-416 >99-417 >99-418 >99-419 >99-420 >99-421 >99-422 >99-423 >99-424 > > >Submitted by ___________________________________________ > >Representing > >WG15 Member Nation _________________________ Date _________ > > >*********************************************************** > >7