From D.Cannon@exeter.ac.uk Thu Sep 16 10:27:03 1999 Received: from exeter.ac.uk (hermes.ex.ac.uk [144.173.6.14]) by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA30293 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:27:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from D.Cannon@exeter.ac.uk) From: D.Cannon@exeter.ac.uk Received: from cronus [144.173.6.20] by hermes via SMTP (JAA02890); Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:27:51 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <16884.199909160827@cronus> Subject: Re: (SC22WG15.1441) (wg15tag 2327) (SC22WG15.1440) RE: (SC22WG15.1438) Draft Minutes To: sc22wg15@dkuug.dk (SC22/WG15 Posix) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:27:50 +0100 (BST) Acknowledge-to: D.Cannon@Exeter.ac.uk X-Organisation: University of Exeter, IT Services X-Disclaimer: The following is a personal statement and does not reflect University of Exeter policy or agreement. X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm not sure that my attempts to email this to Roger directly have been successful, so apologies for the scatter-gun approach - any assistance with document numbering would be appreciated. Cheers, ___________________________________________________________ I've just been scanning the WG15 minutes with the aim of updating the web pages here, and hit a couple of non-conformances between existing documents and the list in section 8.2 of the minutes... The minutes are headed N792, while 8.2 has: N792 Minutes of ad hoc meeting on ISO 14766 The Convener's AI report was posted with N789 as its header, while 8.2 has: N791 Convener Action Item Report and N789 Canadian Action Item Report Could you advise which set of beliefs I should adhere to? All the best, Dave -- _________________________________________________________________________ David Cannon University of Exeter, IT Services Laver Building, North Park Road Systems/Network Programmer Exeter, EX4 4QE, Devon, UK Phone: +44 (0)1392 263939 Fax: +44 (0)1392 211630 _________________________________________________________________________