From keld  Tue Feb 23 17:09:35 1999
Received: (from keld@localhost)
	by dkuug.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA05142;
	Tue, 23 Feb 1999 17:09:35 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from keld)
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 17:09:35 +0100 (CET)
From: Keld J|rn Simonsen <keld>
Message-Id: <199902231609.RAA05142@dkuug.dk>
To: ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org, pasc-pmc@pasc.org
Subject: Re: (pasc-sec 630) POSIX.1/POSIX.2 Revision PAR
Cc: pasc-sec@pasc.org, sc22wg15

> I understand that the PAR will likely need splitting into several
> PARs and we will be seeking the guidance of the PMC in this matter.

Yes, I think the PAR should be split up.


I also think we should be careful with IPR such that the
specification can be available freely on the web, just
like the SUS is today.

JTC1 has some new rules on this, such that JTC 1 standards
that is already freely available on the net can bet made freely
available also in the ISO/IEC version.

I think WG15 should seek such permission.

Keld