From keld  Fri May  1 09:08:19 1998
Received: (from keld@localhost) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA03201; Fri, 1 May 1998 09:08:19 +0200
Message-Id: <199805010708.JAA03201@dkuug.dk>
From: keld@dkuug.dk (Keld J|rn Simonsen)
Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 09:08:18 +0200
In-Reply-To: Roger Martin <roger.martin@Sun.COM>
       "(SC22WG15.1270) Missing WG15 E-mail Distributions to the US Reflector" (May  1,  4:04)
X-Charset: ISO-8859-1
X-Char-Esc: 29
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Mnemonic-Intro: 29
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.2 4/12/91)
To: Roger Martin <roger.martin@Sun.COM>, sc22wg15@dkuug.dk,
        Shane McCarron <shane@themacs.com>
Subject: Re: (SC22WG15.1270) Missing WG15 E-mail Distributions to the US Reflector

Roger Martin writes:

> I have reviewed the WG15 messages (by number) that I have
> received since March 1, 1998.
> 
> I have no record of the following WG15 e-mail messages having
> been distributed via the WG15TAG reflector:
> 
>   SC22WG15.1200
>   SC22WG15.1202
>   SC22WG15.1228
>   SC22WG15.1234
>   SC22WG15.1235
>   SC22WG15.1236
>   SC22WG15.1238
>   SC22WG15.1239
>   SC22WG15.1240 thru SC22WG15.1248
>   SC22WG15.1250
>   SC22WG15.1253
>   
> 
> Seems like the US may have missed out on a rather sizeable number
> of WG15 messages.  Do all of those WG15 e-#s exist?  What must
> be done to distribute them?

They all exist. Shane is resending them, they are all available
as http://www.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg15/<number>

Keld

>   ....roger martin
> 
>