From ajosey@tamarix.rdg.opengroup.org Fri Nov 7 04:13:10 1997 Received: from mailgate.rdg.opengroup.org (mailgate.rdg.opengroup.org [192.153.166.4]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id EAA23215 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 1997 04:13:09 +0100 Received: by mailgate.rdg.opengroup.org; id AA01905; Fri, 7 Nov 1997 03:13:42 GMT Received: by mailhome.rdg.opengroup.org (1.36.108.10/16.2) id AA01148; Fri, 7 Nov 1997 03:10:01 GMT Received: from horizon10.camb.opengroup.org(130.105.39.34) by mailhome.rdg.opengroup.org via smap (V1.3) id sma001137; Fri Nov 7 03:09:43 1997 Received: (from ajosey@localhost) by tamarix.rdg.opengroup.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA03048; Fri, 7 Nov 1997 03:13:43 GMT Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 03:13:43 GMT From: Andrew Josey Message-Id: <199711070313.DAA03048@tamarix.rdg.opengroup.org> To: sc22wg15@dkuug.dk, dave@rc.gc.ca Subject: Re: (SC22WG15.1152) N743 SIG_IGN Inheritance Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Md5: XA+AZqhedLqmZ7r35iniKg== Interesting -this was in comp.std.unix Its a shame that the sender did not include the rest of the discussions, including the counterpoints. Is it normal business for the ISO WGs to put out extracts of netnews as workitems:-) Andrew > From blackwooddj@smtp.srv.gc.ca Fri Nov 7 02:44:58 1997 > Return-Path: > Resent-Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 18:17:01 -0500 (EST) > Reply-To: > From: "D. J. Blackwood" > X-Sequence: SC22WG15@dkuug.dk 1152 > To: > Subject: (SC22WG15.1152) N743 SIG_IGN Inheritance > Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 17:12:52 -0500 > Resent-Message-Id: <"jrT_338QHW.A.rKF.a_kY0"@postman.opengroup.org> > Resent-From: wg15-uk@opengroup.org > X-Mailing-List: wg15-uk:archive/latest/1441 > X-Loop: wg15-uk@opengroup.org > Precedence: list > Resent-Sender: wg15-uk-request@opengroup.org > >