From Jim.Isaak@digital.com Fri Aug 1 14:44:26 1997 Received: from mail12.digital.com (mail12.digital.com [192.208.46.20]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA06866 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 1997 14:44:20 +0200 Received: from cst.ako.dec.com (cst.ako.dec.com [16.151.72.40]) by mail12.digital.com (8.7.5/UNX 1.5/1.0/WV) with SMTP id IAA31505 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 1997 08:39:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by cst.ako.dec.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52) id <01BC9E57.47A5E8D0@cst.ako.dec.com>; Fri, 1 Aug 1997 08:45:36 -0400 Message-ID: From: Jim Isaak To: "'Robert Pritchard'" , "'Stephen R. Walli'" Cc: "'sc22wg15@dkuug.dk'" , "'rjmartin@Eng.Sun.COM'" , "'rinehuls@access.digex.net'" Subject: RE: (wg15tag 1717) (SC22WG15.1071) DoC on POSIX.1g (PII) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 08:45:33 -0400 X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bob Pritchard is correct, we should be moving the PII spec forward to DAM ballot, not another PDAM. Roger ... we need to provide direction to Bill R. on the .1a work as well, we will have a DoC for the PDAM registration in hand soon, draft 13 is out, draft 14 is very close (Lee knows the state) and the question is "PDAM" or "Final PDAM" for the draft (I assume 14?) based on the synch plan? thanks Jim Isaak =========================== Internet Practices Standards Study Group: see: http://computer.org/standard/Internet/ ======================== Home Office: 603-465-3131 Voice mail: 508-264-7678 email (external to Digital): j.isaak@computer.org email -- NEW: Jim.Isaak@DIGITAL.com Physical mail: Digital Equipment Corp. 21 Winding Valley Rd. Hollis, NH 03049 http://stdsbbs.ieee.org/groups/people/jisaak.html "Whether you think you can or you think you can't, you're right" H.Ford ==================================