From ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org Wed Jun 4 08:52:43 1997 Received: from mailgate.rdg.opengroup.org (mailgate.rdg.opengroup.org [192.153.166.4]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id IAA00753 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 08:52:41 +0200 Received: by mailgate.rdg.opengroup.org; id AA06289; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 07:53:23 GMT Message-Id: <9706040753.AA06289@mailgate.rdg.opengroup.org> Received: by mailhome.rdg.opengroup.org (1.36.108.10/16.2) id AA17515; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 07:46:48 +0100 From: ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org (Andrew Josey) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 07:46:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: "william c. rinehuls"'s message as of Jun 3, 11:58am. Reply-To: ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org (Andrew Josey) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: "william c. rinehuls" Subject: Re: (SC22WG15.1017) Record of Response for defect reports/interpretations for 9945-1, -2, 19519 and 13210 Cc: "'a WG15'" On Jun 3, 11:58am in "(SC22WG15.1017) Reco", "william c. rinehuls" wrote: > Hi, Jim: > > I am a bit confused by this note. The procedure is that Defect Reports > and Interpretations must be voted on by SC22. What has to be done is that > you send me (email plain old ASCII if possible) the Defect Reports and What no MS-Word ? :-) I agree that ASCII should be the format. Indeed in IEEE land they started off in ASCII. -> Aside to WG15 -ers - I know you've decided to distribute your docs in Word format - but please also send out ASCII and/or PDF as an alternative - there are no Word viewers for many platforms, and I just want to read the docs not word process them! Andrew ----- Andrew Josey PASC Functional Chair Interpretations The Open Group Apex Plaza,Forbury Road, Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110 Email: a.josey@opengroup.org