From dave@revcan.ca Wed Dec 11 21:49:23 1996 Received: from blackhole.revcan.ca (blackhole.revcan.ca [205.150.42.41]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA23946 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 21:49:22 +0100 Received: from hodgson.revcan.ca (hodgson.revcan.ca [142.136.252.250]) by blackhole with SMTP (DuhMail/2.0) id PAA25627; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 15:44:43 -0500 From: David Blackwood X-Mailer: SCO System V Mail (version 3.2) To: james.isaak@ljo.dec.com, sc22wg15@dkuug.dk Subject: Re: (SC22WG15.924) FW: (wg15tag 1486) FW: (SC22docs.171) SC22 N2351 (Vote Summary on PDAM4 to ISO 9945-1) PII Date: Wed, 11 Dec 96 15:46:21 EST Message-ID: <9612111546.aa25299@hodgson.revcan.ca> > Objections are from Canada (noting missing info, and citing UK > comments), > France (citingneed to resolve issues raised by X/Open); German > (recomending > moving forward with WG15 N697) and the UK (providing the detailed > changes > proposed, and incorporated in N697 as I understand it.) ... > > National Bodies: please provide feedback to Stephe and I (both in this > case) > indicating if N697 will satisfy the concerns you have raised in your > ballots, > and if we can move forward with this document to DAM balloting. I > would > particularly appreciate feedback from France, Germany, UK and Canada > on this. > US: please confirm that N697 (or a draft with similar content, since > this > had some cut and paste as I recall), can be provided for DAM > registration, > and take care of the necessary actions to effect synchronization with > the > IEEE process. > > Thanks, > Jim Isaak I just moved and so all my POSIX stuff is still in boxes somewhere so this is from memory. If N697 is the complete draft with all of the concerns so well documented by the UK taken care of then that will satisfy our objections. Dave -- David J. Blackwood Manager, Internet Services Room 2169, 875 Heron Road Information Highway Initiatives Division Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5 Revenue Canada Voice: 613 957-9305 Fax: 613 952-1095 Internet: dave@revcan.ca