From baker@dad.cs.fsu.edu  Fri Nov  1 23:06:04 1996
Received: from dad.cs.fsu.edu (dad.cs.fsu.edu [128.186.121.23]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id XAA09649; Fri, 1 Nov 1996 23:06:00 +0100
Received:  by dad.cs.fsu.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id WAA13075; Fri, 1 Nov 1996 22:05:31 GMT
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 22:05:31 GMT
From: Ted Baker <baker@dad.cs.fsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199611012205.WAA13075@dad.cs.fsu.edu>
To: ajosey@xopen.org, keld@dkuug.dk, sc22wg15@dkuug.dk
Subject: Re: (wg15-uk 1130) (SC22WG15.906) (wg15tag 1439) N699: WG15 minutes, resolutions, action items 1996-10

| >Of course, the well-known discrepancies between the POSIX.1c
| >thread semantic model and the Ada task semantic model -- which are
| >documented in the unresolved objections on coordination ballot
| >from the POSIX.5 WG -- continue to be a sore point.  I have passed
| >on the comments of the POSIX.4 WG chair that the Ada language
     ^(that is, I passed them on to WG9?)
| >standard should be changed to conform to POSIX.1c.  I would also
| >hope WG15 and IEEE PASC also consider corrigenda to POSIX.1c that
| >would reduce this problem.

| My understanding of a technical corrigenda is a set of corrections to
| known problems - but I am not aware of this issue being agreed
| as that (at least in the .1c world).

Exactly.  The problems are well known.  I hope that the issue will
be considered, that the consideration will lead to agreement, and
the agreement will lead to corrigenda.

--Ted Baker