From ajosey@xopen.org Fri Nov 1 22:52:46 1996 Received: from xopen.xopen.co.uk (xopen.xopen.co.uk [192.153.166.4]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA09521; Fri, 1 Nov 1996 22:52:45 +0100 Received: by xopen.xopen.co.uk; id AA29051; Fri, 1 Nov 1996 21:53:09 GMT Received: by xopuk.xopen.co.uk (1.36.108.3/16.2) id AA10880; Fri, 1 Nov 96 21:52:36 GMT Received: from ukdyn56.xopen.co.uk(192.153.166.56) by xopuk.xopen.co.uk via smap (V1.3) id smac10867; Fri Nov 1 21:52:23 1996 Message-Id: <2.2.32.19961101214129.006f311c@xopuk.xopen.co.uk> X-Sender: ajosey@xopuk.xopen.co.uk X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 01 Nov 1996 21:41:29 +0000 To: Ted Baker , keld@dkuug.dk, sc22wg15@dkuug.dk From: Andrew Josey Subject: Re: (wg15-uk 1130) (SC22WG15.906) (wg15tag 1439) N699: WG15 minutes, resolutions, action items 1996-10 At 18:42 01/11/96 GMT, Ted Baker wrote: >Of course, the well-known discrepancies between the POSIX.1c >thread semantic model and the Ada task semantic model -- which are >documented in the unresolved objections on coordination ballot >from the POSIX.5 WG -- continue to be a sore point. I have passed >on the comments of the POSIX.4 WG chair that the Ada language >standard should be changed to conform to POSIX.1c. I would also >hope WG15 and IEEE PASC also consider corrigenda to POSIX.1c that >would reduce this problem. > My understanding of a technical corrigenda is a set of corrections to known problems - but I am not aware of this issue being agreed as that (at least in the .1c world). regards Andrew ------ Andrew Josey. Email: a.josey@xopen.org Voice: +44 118 950 8311 x2250