From isaak@ljo.dec.com Fri Jul 19 19:55:06 1996 Received: from mail13.digital.com (mail13.digital.com [192.208.46.30]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA28140 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 1996 19:55:01 +0200 Received: from vanna.ljo.dec.com by mail13.digital.com (8.7.5/UNX 1.2/1.0/WV) id NAA30295; Fri, 19 Jul 1996 13:46:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from csac by vanna.ljo.dec.com; (5.65/1.1.8.2/10Oct94-8.2MPM) id AA05408; Fri, 19 Jul 1996 13:44:39 -0400 Received: by csac.ljo.dec.com; id AA32485; Fri, 19 Jul 1996 13:44:36 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 13:44:36 -0400 From: JimIsaak Message-Id: <9607191744.AA32485@csac.ljo.dec.com> To: sc22wg15@dkuug.dk Subject: note on DAM ballot for 9945-2 batch extensions In the WG15 action items (9605-38) we asked if the right draft had been registered as DAM. That action item incorrectly identifies the potential draft numbers. The Draft approved by IEEE is Draft 12, and the draft that was circulated for DAM ballot is 11.2. So the wrong draft is in ballot. This is inconsistent with the Synch plan (either version), something that at least the U.S. will be commenting on in their ballot. jim