From dave@revcan.ca Mon Oct 30 18:40:16 1995 Received: from blackhole.revcan.ca (blackhole.revcan.ca [142.136.224.41]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA17422 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 18:40:13 +0100 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by blackhole.revcan.ca (8.6.7/8.6.6) id MAA26139 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 12:30:29 -0500 Received: from hodgson.revcan.ca(142.136.252.250) by internet.revcan.ca via smap (V1.3) id sma026136; Mon Oct 30 12:30:01 1995 From: David Blackwood X-Mailer: SCO System V Mail (version 3.2) To: isaak@ljo.dec.com, sc22wg15@dkuug.dk Subject: Re: (SC22WG15.719) Oct 96 WG15 dates Date: Mon, 30 Oct 95 12:36:11 EST Message-ID: <9510301236.aa11872@hodgson.revcan.ca> > Ron has done his homework on the issues surrounding Nov 1st as > a German Holiday. It in fact is a holiday which means we can not > get into the IBM facility for meetings, and that many other services > and businesses will be closed. > > Berry: has the IEEE identified it's dates in "final" version yet? > > WG15 folks: do we need a Friday meeting day? (or mabye RIN meets > with PASC folks the week before?? (Keld, any thoughts?)) > > My tenitive recomendation, assuming that IEEE is set in it's > date, is to ask Ron to just set up a 4 day meeting and have RIN > meet the week before. ....please send back any "objections fot > unanimous consent" or whatever on this. > > Thanks, jim My first preference would be to hold all of the meetings the week of October 21 - 25 as originally scheduled. However if they must be moved to October 28 - November 1, that could be accomodated if necessary. Halloween however is a family occasion here that I would prefer not to miss. Splitting the meetings over two weeks would be my last choice and I would suggest that perhaps other alternatives should be considered first such as holding the meetings elsewhere. Perhaps the UK could host October '96 and Germany, May '97? Dave