From isaak@ljo.dec.com Thu May 25 11:35:08 1995
Received: from inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com by dkuug.dk with SMTP id AA21483
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for <sc22wg15@dkuug.dk>); Thu, 25 May 1995 21:42:54 +0200
Received: from vanna.ljo.dec.com by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com (5.65/24Feb95)
	id AA29255; Thu, 25 May 95 12:35:12 -0700
Received: from csac by vanna.ljo.dec.com; (5.65/1.1.8.2/10Oct94-8.2MPM)
	id AA27298; Thu, 25 May 1995 15:24:07 -0400
Received: by csac.ljo.dec.com; id AA11472; Thu, 25 May 1995 15:35:08 -0400
Date: Thu, 25 May 1995 15:35:08 -0400
From: JimIsaak <isaak@ljo.dec.com>
Message-Id: <9505251935.AA11472@csac.ljo.dec.com>
To: sc22wg15@dkuug.dk
Subject: Merged 9945-1 with amendments & Technical corregendia
Cc: m.nielsen@ieee.org
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29


	At the May meeting we resolved to publish the 9945-1
document with the amendment (real time, DAM1), and the technical
corregendia as a single document (with change bars).

	We did not discuss how we wanted to deal with DAM2 (Threads)
which will complete ISO balloting in Septeber (maybe before the
technical corregendia) ....

	I assume, based on the approach of the May meeting, that
the preference will be to have the 1995 version of 9945-1 contain
the DAM1, DAM2 and the technical corregenda.  Please let me know
if this is not the case!!

	[The other "obvious" way to publish would be with 9945-1
and Amendment 1 (DAM1) as a book real quick; and then follow it
with an amendment book in the fall that contains both the DAM2
and the technical corregendia --- but this does have the disadvantage
of having multiple documents you need to look at to see what a
specific function has as "1995" capabilities.]

Please get back to me with comments or concerns by June 1st if
possible.

Thanks,
Jim