From keld@dkuug.dk Sat Feb  4 15:37:37 1995
Received: by dkuug.dk id AA20656
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for sc22wg15@dkuug.dk); Sat, 4 Feb 1995 14:37:38 +0100
Message-Id: <199502041337.AA20656@dkuug.dk>
From: keld@dkuug.dk (Keld J|rn Simonsen)
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 1995 14:37:37 +0100
In-Reply-To: isaak@csac.ljo.dec.com (Jim Isaak- isaak@csac.enet.dec.com)
       "(SC22WG15.471) Merger of 9945-1 and real time amendments" (Feb  3, 17:14)
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Mnemonic-Intro: 29
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.2 4/12/91)
To: isaak@csac.ljo.dec.com (Jim Isaak- isaak@csac.enet.dec.com),
        sc22wg15@dkuug.dk
Subject: Re: (SC22WG15.471) Merger of 9945-1 and real time amendments

Jim Isaak- isaak@csac.enet.dec.com writes:

> 
> It has been proposed that the real time amendments recently
> approved at the DAM level be published together in a merged
> document at the ISO level (just as it has been done at the
> U.S. level via IEEE) rather than have a seperate amendment
> published.  I need to confirm that this is acceptable
> to the WG15 folks, so Please get back to me with any
> objections you have to this course of action.  If I don't
> hear any objections by Feb. 8th - Or a request to be more
> formal in terms of a letter ballot of WG15 ... I will
> indicate to Joe Cote that this merger is acceptable to
> WG15.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jim Isaak
> (PS. if HoD's can indicate that they received this, then I
> will know that we have at least gotten the question visible
> where it needs to be visable. ... Thanks, Jim)

OK with DS.
and ACK to receivement

Keld