From isaak@csac.zko.dec.com Wed May 26 07:00:59 1993
Received: from crl.dec.com by dkuug.dk with SMTP id AA09947
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for <sc22wg15@dkuug.dk>); Wed, 26 May 1993 16:59:23 +0200
Received: by crl.dec.com; id AA15450; Wed, 26 May 93 10:59:27 -0400
Received: by csac.zko.dec.com (5.65/fma-100391/BobG-15-Feb-93);id AA28448; Wed, 26 May 1993 11:00:59 -0400
Date: Wed, 26 May 1993 11:00:59 -0400
From: isaak@csac.zko.dec.com (Jim Isaak-respond via isaak@decvax.dec.com)
Message-Id: <9305261500.AA28448@csac.zko.dec.com>
To: hlj@posix.com
Subject: dispostion of comments on 9945-2
Cc: m.nielsen@ieee.org, sc22wg15@dkuug.dk
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29

I had a short conversation with Joe Cote
on the timing of the disposition for the ballot
that closes June 6th.  He indicates that ITTF
expects the disposition and updated document
within 60 to 90 days from the close of ballot,
and that we should plan a path that will provide
this result.  He also indicates that it is not
expected that editorial meetings have the same
overhead of notice that is associated with WG
meetings, although he sees how that could have
gotten into the latest directives by implication.

In any case, here is what I suggest we do to address
this need:

1) ask all member bodies active in WG15 to provide us
   with EMAIL copies of any ballot comments so we can
   get early visability to the issues, and also so
   that can be used to format a proposed disposition.
   (specifically, can folks send comments to Hal)

2) ask the .2 group in the U.S. to provide an initial
   response to these at the July meeting, and have the
   project editor format that into a proposed
   "disposition of comments" per our earlier discussions.

   [PS. it is my understanding that Hal cannot attend the
   July IEEE meeting]

3) I will distribute the disposition of comments to WG15
   for a email/mail letter balloting process; asking for
   member bodies to indicate any objections/changes with
   a cut off date.  -- objections & proposed changes will
   be taken into account, and the resulting document forwarded
   with the revised (if any) 9945-2 though SC22 to ITTF for
   publication.

All of this should occur before the Oct. meetings [target date
based on ITTF guidelines would be submission to ITTF by
the first of September or so.]

Please let me know if you see any problems with this.

National Bodies: please provide the email input, and be
prepared to deal with the disposition of comments document
in the August timeframe with a very short window for action.

Thanks
Jim