From isaak@csac.zko.dec.com Thu May  6 07:30:25 1993
Received: from crl.dec.com by dkuug.dk with SMTP id AA02582
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for <sc22wg15@dkuug.dk>); Thu, 6 May 1993 17:49:14 +0200
Received: by crl.dec.com; id AA20908; Thu, 6 May 93 11:49:17 -0400
Received: by csac.zko.dec.com (5.65/fma-100391/BobG-15-Feb-93);id AA11943; Thu, 6 May 1993 11:30:25 -0400
Date: Thu, 6 May 1993 11:30:25 -0400
From: isaak@csac.zko.dec.com (Jim Isaak-respond via isaak@decvax.dec.com)
Message-Id: <9305061530.AA11943@csac.zko.dec.com>
To: sc22wg15@dkuug.dk
Subject: note on revision of synch plan
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29

I received a number of excellent editorail comments,
and one change that might be viewed as substanitive,
but is consistent with our current practice.  I've 
included these in the revision that I just mailed out,
and I would suggest that this be taken as the base
document for discussion.

The substanitive revision is in section 1.1 on the
re-distribution of documents by HoD's -- it was pointed
out that it is not intended to be "restricted to a country"
but rather to be "for the purposes of national body comment"
so this is the change proposed there.

The other change bars reflect changes that impact the
text or look, but I do not belive are substaitive.
[One change of Technical Committee on Operating Systems...
is very visable, but not substanitive.]

I did not mark changes in capitalization, addition of periods,
or removal of excess whitespace.

Jim