From isaak@unix.ttb.dec.com Fri Feb 28 22:59:39 1992
Received: from decvax.dec.com by dkuug.dk via EUnet with SMTP (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8)
	id AA06406; Fri, 28 Feb 92 22:59:39 +0100
Received: by decvax.dec.com (5.57/decvax-27Nov90)
	id AA21390; Fri, 28 Feb 92 16:59:23 -0500
Received: by unix.ttb.dec.com (5.57/ULTRIX-fma-031291);
	id AA21583; Fri, 28 Feb 92 16:59:20 -0500
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 92 16:59:20 -0500
From: isaak@unix.ttb.dec.com (Jim Isaak-respond via isaak@decvax.dec.com)
Message-Id: <9202282159.AA21583@unix.ttb.dec.com>
To: sc22wg15@dkuug.dk
Subject: PCTE April 9-10 Paris -- FYI
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29

WG15 folks, FYI on this meeting,
	Jim
=============
From: xirtlu::SC22-request@dkuug.dk
To: SC22 <SC22%dkuug.dk@uknet.ac.uk>, UKPROGLANG@ed.ac.uk
Subject: (SC22.60) PCTE workshop

I see from JTC1 N1789 that there is an ECMA-sponsored PCTE workshop in Paris 
on April 9-10 to prepare the 3 ECMA PCTE standards for endorsement by 
fast-track.   MB experts invited.

Is anyone from SC22 going (a) with a particular interest in PCTE from the SC22 
perspective; (b) at all?

At the very least it would be desirable to have an objective report back on 
what happens and its potential impact on SC22.

Brian Meek

================== RFC 822 Headers ==================